Syllogism: Traffic Congestion
CAT 1999 Slot 1 · DILR · Easy · Logical Reasoning
Choose the option which indicates a valid argument, that is, where the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements.
A. Traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide in the environment. B. Increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to health. C. Traffic congestion is hazardous to health. D. Some traffic congestion does not cause increased carbon monoxide. E. Some traffic congestion is not hazardous to health.
- A.
CBA
- B.
BDE
- C.
CDE
- D.
BAC
D
Explanation
BAC: Premise B: 'Increase in carbon monoxide is hazardous to health.' Premise A: 'Traffic congestion increases carbon monoxide...' Conclusion C: 'Traffic congestion is hazardous to health.' This forms a valid chain of reasoning.
Practise this under exam conditions
Sign in to solve it with a live timer, the on-screen CAT calculator, and streak and accuracy tracking across every question you attempt.
Solve in the workspace