Detecting Cheating in Examination
XAT 2013 · DM · Medium · Decision Making
Passage / data set
A teacher wanted to administer a multiple choice (each question having six choices) based quiz of high difficulty level to a class of sixty students. The quiz had sixty questions. The probability of selecting the correct answer for a good student and a brilliant student was 0.2 and 0.25 respectively. The poor students had no learning advantage. The teacher did not want students to cheat but does not have time and resources to monitor. All students were seated serially in 10 rows and 6 columns.
Question 1 of 2
Is it possible for the teacher to detect cheating without monitoring? Choose the statement that best describes your opinion:
- A.
It is not at all possible; teacher will have to introduce technology if there is no human support.
- B.
It is always possible; but teacher has to calculate the exact answer.
- C.
It is possible when many students sitting next to each other have the same incorrect answers for multiple questions. However, there can be a small error in judgment.
- D.
It is possible when many students sitting next to each other have the same correct answers for multiple questions. However, there can be a small error in judgment.
- E.
It is possible only for poor students but not for good and brilliant students. However, there can be a small error in judgment.
Question 2 of 2
Three good students were seated next to each other. What is the probability of them having the same incorrect choice for four consecutive questions?
- A.
256/390625
- B.
256/3125
- C.
4/3125
- D.
1/3125
- E.
Cannot be calculated
Practise this under exam conditions
Sign in to solve it with a live timer, the on-screen CAT calculator, and streak and accuracy tracking across every question you attempt.
Solve in the workspace