Political parties ban argument
CMAT 2019 · Logical Reasoning · Medium · Logical Reasoning
In the following question a statement is given followed by two arguments choose the correct option.
Statement: Should the political parties be banned? Argument I: Yes, It is necessary to teach a lesson to the politicians Argument II: No, it will lead to an end of democracy
- A.
Both the arguments are strong
- B.
Only II is strong
- C.
Neither I, nor II is strong
- D.
Only I is strong
B
Explanation
Argument I is weak and personal/vindictive ("teaching a lesson"). Argument II is a strong logical consequence because political parties are essential to representative democracy. Hence, only II is strong.
Related Logical Reasoning questions
- #3548Conditional logic evaluationCMATLRMCQMedium
- #3550Sports played by four friendsCMATLRMCQEasy
- #3553Marks comparison among five boysCMATLRMCQEasy
- #3554Ordered pair logical consistencyCMATLRMCQMedium
- #3558Fruit weight orderingCMATLRMCQEasy
- #3561Family member profession puzzleCMATLRMCQMedium
- #3567Married Couples in FamilyCMATLRMCQMedium
- #3637Scheduling experts for advice sessionsCMATLRMCQHard
Practise this under exam conditions
Sign in to solve it with a live timer, the on-screen CAT calculator, and streak and accuracy tracking across every question you attempt.
Solve in the workspace